Guests are free to browse the forums, although you will need to register for an account if you wish to participate in the discussions or use any of the advanced features of the forum (bookmarks, history, etc).
If you already have an account, please sign in now.
The Watercooler is powered by Vanilla, the sweetest forum on the web.
It was a flat, dull relationship that was doomed from the start and provided little to no insight into any of the people involved.
Like Mark (?) and Ann on Parks & Rec?
There's been a lot of new cast members introduced over the seasons. Unless I'm forgetting some, only Andy and Holly really worked, and only Andy stuck around. I guess Wallace was a new character at one point. He worked out and stick around, but he was a minor and occasional character for a long time.
I always liked Wallace. And Andy. But especially Wallace. And Andy.
Where Wallace at?!?
We went to the movies on Friday and I saw a Will Ferrell/Markie Mark movie preview and Wallace was in the preview as someone who was just about to jump off a building. Don't jump!
I want to trade Erin for Holly. Or Erin for the Sikh IT guy. Or Erin for homeless Devon. Or Erin for Ronnie. Or just stop focusing too much on her and Andy. Is that too much to ask?
I'd trade 'em both for the real Jim and Pam back.
Me too. I can't believe they re-ran Scott's Tots last week which was the worst for them.
I'd agree, or disagree, if I could remember a thing about that episode. At the same time, I could probably recreate the script for Booze Cruise from memory 4.5 years after it first aired.
At the same time, I could probably recreate the script for Booze Cruise from memory 4.5 years after it first aired.
You know I think you're right. I might be able to quote every line.
I want to trade Erin for Holly. Or Erin for the Sikh IT guy. Or Erin for homeless Devon. Or Erin for Ronnie. Or just stop focusing too much on her and Andy. Is that too much to ask?
I couldn't agree more.